Thread:KRJones87/@comment-24901686-20200928112214/@comment-3574053-20200929051400

KRJones87 wrote: I think runes are stylistically more similar to images than modern text, so I don't think they will fit well on the infobox like that.

I also think that people tend to over-emphasize the infoboxes, filling them with too much information, and making them cluttered. I worry adding runes to the infoboxes might just add to the clutter.

As an alternative, I suggest that if you want to add a rune to the infobox, it should be done as a second image file on the infobox.

Below is a link to show you what I mean:

https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:792226?useskin=oasis Egyptian hieroglyphics is in the Infoboxes here; that's probably the closest script to images here. In particular, I wanted to incorporate the indigenous scrips with corresponding myths, such as what I did with Kambaltou in the Tifinagh script. For texts like runes or Neo-Punic for Eastern Berber mythology, I would probably have to use some template to add it.

Do you have any advice for that?

Thanks,

AmazingAncientWorld (talk) 05:14, September 29, 2020 (UTC)